WHO's Imperial College propagandist shills: 'Disease X' is 20 Times more Fatal Than COVID-19" -
Deadly Lies and Misinformation Keep Coming
Robert W. Malone MD MS: "The WHO has created a future (non-existent) infectious disease of unknown origin called disease X, that according to anonymous WHO “experts” will wipe out millions, if not billions of people. Disease X is said to be a given and we must prepare now. In fact, UK scientists are already making a vaccine <insert sarcasm emoji>!”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The deadly lies and misinformation keep coming courtesy of Neil Ferguson and the WHO/Gates/BigPharma-funded Imperial College of London, the same serious sociopaths who played a major role in creating the original fraud-- and caused many millions to suffer and die as a result.
Failure to understand this reality will only make it easier for them to do it again— which is clearly their plan.
As a refresher on what we have lived through, in December 2021, I wrote:
1- The seriousness of c19 was vastly (and falsely) over-exaggerated, over-hyped from the get-go to maximize public FEAR (which appears to the marketing plan from the outset). Wildly erroneous projections by Prof. Neil Ferguson, Imperial College London epidemiologist, of 2.2 million deaths in US (and 500k+ in UK), were rapidly adopted by US, UK & WHO to impose worldwide lockdowns, masks etc. (https://www.aier.org/article/imperial-college-predicted-catastrophe-in-every-country-on-earth-then-the-models-failed/). The projections were eventually walked back but the damage (scaring the bejesus out of everyone to prime them for the experi-vax as the only solution) was already done.
(ed. note: Glaringly missing from the Sept. 26, 2023 Malone commentary below is the fact that in March 2020, almost simultaneous w Ferguson's wildly exaggerated predictions of Global catastrophe, the Gates Foundation awarded Ferguson’s Imperial College the tidy sum of $79 Million dollars! (https://davidicke.com/2020/04/16/excellent-ukcolumn-exposure-gates-connections-imperial-college-neil-ferguson-digital-id-covid-19-lockdowns-total-stitch/)
1b- The BigPharma BigLie was that everyone stood a good chance of getting infected and dying from c19 unless vaccinated. But public data has confirmed for more than a year that: 99.8% of people <70 survive C19 just fine, without any “vaccine”; same as 95% of people >70;
that 99.997% of children survive without any vax, and that 97% of all covid deaths were among patients w 2 or more co-morbidities (https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2021/pdf/21_0123.pdf).
BigPharma created a death cult mass hysteria based on non-existant science. They used a similar flim flam to allege 99% relative efficacy of vax, ignoring absolute efficacy (only 1%). Again, a marketing triumph.
2- As if it were part of a plan in force, Christian Drosten's PCR test to detect active C19 virus was adopted by WHO on Jan 23, 2020 (and shortly thereafter by FDA, CDC, etc) as the gold standard for detecting Covid, even though the inventor Kary Mullis, had argued that it could not and should not be used to accurately diagnose disease, and dozens of scientists challenged using it for such purpose. (https://principia-scientific.com/christian-drosten-the-fraud-behind-covid-19-pcr-testing/)
The Drosten protocol also included a replication rate of 45 cycles, later determined to be almost double the appropriate number, and resulting in a massive number of false positives, further increasing the FEAR level, which was likely the intention all along. This is part of the basis for the “crimes against humanity” cases being initiated in Europe and elsewhere. (https://justice4poland.com/2021/10/18/new-nuremberg-trials-crimes-against-humanity/)
3- Sale and use of chloroquine (& hydroxychloroquine) which was FDA-approved drug and hailed in a 2005 NIH study as "a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread": (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/) was restricted in France as of January 2020 (by Health Minister proclamation of October 2019) and subsequently demonized in USA and rest of the world in order to be able to get EUAs for the experimental mRNA “vaccines” which legally could not have been granted if any other remedy existed. (See also: Hydroxychloroquine 15 Years Ago to Cure Coronaviruses; “Nobody Needed to Die” - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalizationhttps://www.globalresearch.ca/cover-up-fauci-approved-chloroquine-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-cure-coronaviruses/5713659)
4. FDA, CDC & WHO protocols advocating against early treatment of C19 symptoms (and still do) while tptb well knew that safe, effective, inexpensive (off patent) treatments already existed (as early as April 2020 - See Dr. Zelenko, etal, and by winter 2020 re Ivermectin), was a willful, premeditated act proximately causing the unnecessary, altogether avoidable suffering and death of millions worldwide.
5. Belgian virologist/vaccinologist Geert Vanden Bossche started warning in March 2021 that mass vaccination (with a non-steriliziing vaccine) in the midst of a pandemic would only breed more infectious mutant variants resistant to the original vax, and diminish the effectiveness of the native immune system to deal with future viruses precipitating a marked influx of breakthrough cases in the doubly and triply vaxed as we are seeing all over the world today. https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/videos-and-interviews/geert-vanden-bossche-interview-at-the-highwire
For me, personally, the most important point about “boosters” is that as currently formulated, they’re the same old non-neutralizing shit used vs. Wuhan strain that has proved totally ineffective against Delta, Omicron, etc., and significantly dangerous short (VAERS) and likely, long term. Governments knowing all this and still imposing them on people fits Einstein’s classic definition of insanity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now, 9/26/2023, Robert Malone MD MS writes:
"'Disease X' is 20 Times more Fatal Than COVID-19”
“Disease X” is the newest diversion to create fear worldwide
The WHO has created a future (non-existent) infectious disease of unknown origin called disease X, that according to anonymous WHO “experts” will wipe out millions, if not billions of people. Disease X is said to be a given and we must prepare now. In fact, UK scientists are already making a vaccine <insert sarcasm emoji>!
Or so say the "experts".
SEP 26, 2023
The MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (MRC GIDA) at the Imperial College of London is a "WHO Collaborating Centre for infectious disease modelling." This is the organization supporting the modeler Dr. Neil Fergusen. He is the one that published the apocalyptic prediction of a case fatality rate of 3.4% for COVID in 2020 - which governments across the world used to justify lockdowns. This modeling was faulty - more than that, it was irresponsible and it resulted in great world harm to publish such a demonstrably false number.
The lockdowns "have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, and undermining liberal democracy,” - according to a 2022 John's Hopkins study.
The Imperial College report was also the basis for much of the modeling used by COVID Act Now (a non-profit run by Democratic activists) that local and state officials in the U.S also relied on. This then led to “shelter-in-place” mandates (madness). COVID Act Now has is an online mapping tool that generates models predicting coronavirus hospitalizations, which have also already proved to be wildly inaccurate.
Jessica Hamzelou at New Scientist documents the systematic errors researchers and scientists found with the modeling by Neil Fergusen/MRC GIDA COVID Act Now relied on:
Chen Shen at the New England Complex Systems Institute, a research group in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and his colleagues argue that the Imperial team’s model is flawed, and contains ‘incorrect assumptions’. They point out that the Imperial team’s model doesn’t account for the availability of tests, or the possibility of ‘super-spreader events’ at gatherings, and has other issues.
Nicknamed, “The Master of Disaster.”
This is not the first time that Dr. Fergusen/MRC GIDA has caused wide spread panic. They have a long track record of making outrageous modeling claims for new infectious disease outbreaks.
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that, by 2080, up to 150,000 people could die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay.
So the real scandal is: Why did anyone ever listen to this guy?
What damage did his faulty modeling cause worldwide?
In South Africa, 73,000 troops were used to enforce lockdowns on many people who live “Meal-to-meal”. This draconian governmental response was replicated through out the world. For instance in the USA - Hawaii had various quarantines, traveler restrictions and lock-down requirements for 1.5 years. In many poorer nations, people lost their lives due to the lockdowns. Of course, this was not documented by the WHO or governments, but the excess mortality during 2020 in many “less developed” countries that did not have severe COVID outbreaks cannot be denied.
Yet still continuing into the present, the MRC GIDA is a WHO collaborating center for infectious disease modeling. Even after all of this, the WHO is still using Dr. Ferguson and his team to “model” future infectious disease outbreaks.
The MRC Centre maintains close collaborative partnerships with public and global health agencies (notably the World Health Organization, where we are a Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling), governments and non-governmental bodies across the world. With over 200 researchers, we are one of the largest centres of our kind. This gives us a unique capacity to respond to emerging threats with real-time analysis and predictive modelling of epidemiological and genomic data – and to provide timely evidence-based input to urgent policy questions for major endemic diseases such as HIV, malaria and tuberculosis. Much of our work is highly interdisciplinary, spanning epidemiology, mathematical modelling, pathogen genomics, implementation science and health economics.
Bad science and bad modeling that causes worldwide harms including significant death should not be rewarded. Except that the WHO has benefited enormously from this fear mongering. They have received millions, if not billions from governments to fight the pandemic, they are expanding their infectious disease public health global presence and more importantly, COVID-19 has allowed them to expand their control of governments worldwide- and to advance support for a “one-world government” which they would benefit from- financially and politically. This is being codified in the new, amended International Health Regulations. Whereby, the Director General of the WHO can declare a public health emergency and also declare what must be done about it worldwide.
If Dr. Tedros wants to declare gun violence as a public health emergency of international concern, he could do so under the new IHRs.
But back to the MRC GIDA. there have literally been no consequences for the MRC GIDA publications that have grossly over estimated deaths from multiple outbreaks, spanning decades. MRC GIDA are still actively collecting money for infectious disease outbreak modeling from the World Health Organization (WHO).
Below are the responsible WHO officers and technical officers for this contract. Their work-related contacts (not personal - I am not doxing anyone) are also below. Please consider calling or emailing them to express your disappointment with the WHO in their continuing funding to the MRC for infectious disease outbreak modeling. The MRC and the WHO has caused decades of panic worldwide, resulting in great harms by both creating faulty models and using faulty model to push population level lockdowns, masking and now vaccine mandates. Future plans include vaccine passports. Using modeling to predict future outbreaks has never been shown to work and are not endorsed by traditional public health policies.
Responsible Officer:
SHINDO, Nahoko Phone: +41 22 791 3446
+41 22 791 3446 Email: shindon@who.int
Technical Counterpart:
PEBODY, Richard: Phone: +4545336676
+4545336676 Email: pebodyr@who.int
“Disease X” is the newest diversion to create fear worldwide
The WHO has created a future (non-existent) infectious disease of unknown origin called disease X, that according to anonymous WHO “experts” will wipe out millions, if not billions of people. Disease X is said to be a given and we must prepare now. In fact, UK scientists are already making a vaccine <insert sarcasm emoji>!
Some recent headlines about disease X:
Who needs faulty modelers, when the WHO can just create panic based on a fictitious disease? Gosh, according to the headlines above, the WHO is already “decoding” the pathogen before it is even identified. That is truly an amazing feat of science <insert sarcasm emoji again>. This is the public health crisis that WHO has been preparing for! The WHO can now model worldwide death and destruction before the virus is even identified. This is yet another permacrisis!
War, climate change, economic stagnation, political polarisation — there seems to be no shortage of crises these days. Indeed, the situation is so perilous that the rarely hysterical Financial Times last year named “polycrisis” one of its words of the year, defining it as “a cluster of related global risks with compounding effects, such that the overall impact exceeds the sum of each part”. The concept was initially popularised by Adam Tooze and has since been endorsed even by the World Economic Forum. The UN, for what it is worth, prefers to talk of “overlapping crises”.
Remember that much of the WHO funding comes from big pharma and big tech. In fact, they do not disclose what percentage of their funding now comes from corporations and NGO versus governments. Frankly, disease X reeks of regulatory capture to me!
The world deserves better than this in the future.
The updated international health regulations (IHRs) are now being developed by the WHO. These require even more stringent world control by the UN/WHO, combined with loss of sovereignty by independent nation states. This is not acceptable. It is time for the USA to just say no. It is time for the USA to remove themselves from the WHO for good.
This is why we need a strong president, one who is willing to say “no” to the self-styled “international health community” headed up by the WHO. Public health is being weaponized as a tool to build a New World Order, one that places the UN in control of the world.
This is why President Biden must never be elected again. Elections have consequences. It is time for a major change in the House, the Senate and the Presidency.
Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also missing from the otherwise accurate and important Malone piece below is:
From: https://www.iedm.org/the-flawed-covid-19-model-that-locked-down-canada/
"Why was Professor Ferguson so influential? Mark Landler and Stephen Castle wrote in The New York Times, “It wasn’t so much the numbers themselves, frightening though they were, as who reported them: Imperial College London.” With the professor’s ties to the WHO, the authors noted, Imperial was “treated as a sort of gold standard, its mathematical models feeding directly into government policies.” The title of the Times article said that Ferguson’s report had “jarred the U.S. and the U.K. to action,” as Britain shelved its original strategy of allowing herd immunity to spread in favour of a strict lockdown.(7)"
"So, why did Boris Johnson and our government turn to his (Ferguson’s) models for guidance early on in the COVID crisis? Why did they accept Ferguson’s assertions that lockdowns would work, without any evidence or public policy guidance indicating that such draconian measures would have any impact whatsoever?” Why indeed?