A not to be missed, concise 22 min. review of the horrendously, tremendously bad picks by Trump for his foreign policy advisors:
Danger: The old boss-- same as the new boss.
Concise 22 min. excellent review of the horrendously, tremendously bad picks by Trump for his foreign policy, etc., advisors:
reckless, blood-thirsty war-mongering neocons, venal eugenicist Covid-vax pushers, and First Amendment opposing shills for Big Pharma, the Military Industrial Lie & Spy Complex that courts nuclear armageddon, genocide, deadly mRNA shots, vaccine passports, Central Bank Digital Currencies, a bio-metrics based personally invasive China-style social credit system, and a WEF-style new world order One World gov (long sought by Rockefellers) where national sovereignties and personal freedoms will be completely subordinated to the rule of elite bankers and technocrats who control everything now, but not as firmly as they want to.
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” — David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, 1991
By these picks, Trump proves he’s the lo-life ahole New Yorkers have long known him to be, that the old boss- same as the new boss, and that the deepstate sociopaths currently running the country remain in control, and have told him to “shape up”— or the third attempt on his life will absolutely not fail.
It's weird that Trump would nominate both Nesheiwat for SG and Bhattacharya for NIH, people who are at opposite ends of the Pfizer pfellation spectrum.
I just don't know how to interpret that contradiction.